No man has a natural right to commit aggression

The United States make-up is a document considered almost sacred by many an(prenominal)Who wear in this country. Liberty and emancipation ar often considered our greatest resources (Burns, Peltason & Cronin p10). However, succession the idea of liberty and arbitrator for all stands optimistically in its citizens minds, the reality is much much complicated. Questions arise such(prenominal) as does freedom of speech include yelling fire in a crowd theater? When one persons rights infringe upon another, whose liberties take antecedency? In some cases, the question has even arisen, does all men are created equal really apply to all men? What about women?In creating the United States, a fine parallelism has been created between the absolute majority and the minority. Obviously, for a functioning democracy to work, the majority vote would rule. As Abraham Lincoln express Unanimity is impossible the rule of a minority, as a everlasting arrangement, is wholly inadmissible (Reja i p70). However, he also commented that the majority must be constrained With deliberate changes of popular opinion and sentiments (Rejai p70) in order to rest a free people.Still it was important to the founders of the United States for the importance of the one-on-one to be retained. The Bill of Rights, especially the first amendment, was written to remove goernances ability to limit those rights (Burns, Peltason & Cronin p11). The authors understood that freedom of speech, the press and righteousness were major rights and needed extra protection from repression.Over time the politics was also used to prevent soulfulnesss from impeding on the rights of other persons. For instance, Amendment 26 in the Bill of Rights states The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen eld of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or cut by the United States of by any other State on account of age. Upon reaching adulthood, it was determined that everyone should have their e qual vote (Burns, Peltason & Cronin p 14) and no one should be able to deny an individual that right. minority rights continue to be an issue, however, despite the passing of several amendments to protect such rights. In some cases, this is done because it has been determined that the protection of society is more important than the rights of the individual. The fourteenth amendment, for instance, states No State shall make or impose any faithfulness which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States. However, in many cases, laws are passed that interfere with the right of sexual predators by forcing them to declare themselves to law enforcement and/or their neighbors.In other cases, despite the goal of liberty and justice for all minorities continue to be discriminated against for religious or political reasons, or simply because they are minorities. Homosexuals, for instance, continue to be denied the right to marry in the majority of states (Nava & Dawidoff pxii). In this case, the vote of the majority continues to outweigh the minority despite the loss of civil liberties and despite that fact that this has no direct heart on the majority.On the other hand, in certain cases when the rights of the minority and the majority clash, the minority-member is given precedence, due to past injustices done to the minority as a whole. This is the case in affirmative action, where minorities are given preference over the majority due to their past lack of status. The practice actualizeks to make up for previous lack of economic and educational opportunities, often at the set down of those classes who have had them.The balance between the society and the individual, majorities and minorities is a difficult one. In forming the Constitution, attempts were made to appease all sides and amendments were made as societys ideas of what were important changed. This pendulum continues to be in constant flux, with the majority or minorities o n occasion taking precedence over the other as elected officials see a need. It remains a vital process however, since the entire grounding of the United States is dependant on this equilibrium.How can we maintain the proper balance between liberty and order, between diversity and uniformity, between individual rights and incarnate needs?The problem, then, is how to balance individual rights against collective needs, remembering always that individual freedom and social order are necessary to each other. ( Burns, Peltason, & Cronin p124)BibliographyBurns, J.M., Peltason, J.W., & Cronin, T.E.. (1975). authorities bythe People, 9th Edition. Englewood Cliffs, unused Jersey Prentice-Hall, Inc.Nava Michael & Dawidoff, Robert. (1994). Created Euqal Why Gay Rights Matter toAmerica. New York St. Martins Press.Rejai, M.. (1976). Democracy The Contemporary Theories. New YorkAtherton Press.Shein, Lori (ed). (1998). Inequality Opposing Viewpoints to amicable Problems. DanDiego, CA Greenhav en Pres, Inc.