Compare Two Speeches Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Compare Two Speeches - Essay ExampleSeen in the larger scene of the plot, it is noteworthy that the two defendants whom the lawyers voicing the two specific speeches are trying to protect stand a potential chance of getting convicted owing to the instrument panel possibly being biased with respect to their flight and ethnic identity. Hence, no wonder, the two speeches are indeed moving texts that intend to persuade the jury against succumbing to the dominant racial biases and prejudices. Yet, there is no denying the fact that both these speeches tend to differ in their structure, form and content, and the scheme they resort to while trying to move the conscience of the jury. While the speech mad by genus Atticus in To Kill a Mockingbird is expansive, elaborate and emotive, the speech make by Charlie in the defense force of Reverend Andrews is more factual, terse and tactical. The speech made by Atticus in To Kill a Mockingbird does indeed construct an organic structure with a beginning, middle and an end. The character of Atticus systematically moves about to make an impression on the jury by making his speech to be dictated at the end of his systematic enunciation of the facts and the operational evidence be frontward the jury. This strategy has a jibe fold advantage in the sense that it not only segregates the two pivotal issues involved in the concerned trial that are the technical aspects associated with the trial and the larger issue of racial bias that could have a detrimental wedge with regards to the defendant. Hence, without any doubt, this approach allows Atticus to methodically and systematically bring to fore the simmering issue of racial prejudice in the court house, which was not only till at one time being sidelined or taken for granted, but is also bound to have a decisive impact on the trial. The character of Atticus astutely adapts ones mannerisms and body language to suit the gravitational attraction of the situation as is evid ent from, he did something he didnt ordinarily do. He unhitched his watch and fibril and placed them on the table. In terms of content, the speech made by Atticus could be regarded to be emotive, while at the same time being factual in the sense that it lays bleak the incidence and prevalence of racism in the society of his times, while urging the jury to rise supra such narrow considerations, so as to decide the case while taking into consideration the available factual evidence. Commensurately, while making this speech, Atticus comes out as an authoritative speaker who has a self-coloured grip over the social undercurrents of his times as he says, She has committed no crime, she has merely disconnected a rigid and time honored code of our society While doing so Atticus rises above the role of an ordinary lawyer intending to protect ones client to be a phonation of reason and sanity, not only having a firm grip over the essentials of the law of the land, but also symbolic o f an attitude that supports an objective and unbiased approach towards legal issues that he believes to be the guiding normal behind the law that he intends to uphold. It goes without saying that Atticus is amply aware of the mindset of his audience that is the jury and hence had tailored his speech to usher in a voice of reason and fairness into an flavour that had already been presumed to be calcified and crystallized, in an informal if not in a solemn manner. The speech made to the jury