Charlotte Temple - Ideas of Love Essay -- essays papers

Charlotte tabernacle - Ideas of Love In the 18th century, when Charlotte tabernacle was written, societys ideasabout women, love, and obligations were extremely different from viewsheld in the twentieth century. Women did not have many rights, and societymake them think that their slip in life was to marry well. They werenot supposed to have desires or hopes for an amazing kind of love. Theywere merely supposed to marry the man who their families think themto marry, and live their lives being a dutiful wife and mother. Lovehad a similar essence in the 1700s. It was not looked at as beingessential to a relationship convenience and complaisant status was to a greater extentimportant than love in an 18th century marriage. Finally, heartyobligations were virtually completely opposite thusly to what they are now. As opposed to twentieth century obligations to the self, education, andwealth, the 18th century focused more on social status and family, andnot so many personal or self-employed person obligations. (Eighteenth) InCharlotte Temple, a radical idea concerning a equipment failure of social norms,and a restructuring of important obligations was presented. Familialand social responsibilities seemed to take a backseat to Charlottes(and other characters) independent and personal lives. For this reason,Charlotte Temple was a extremist novel that gave people in the 18thcentury a vernal way of looking at life. It emphasized love and emotions,while treat conventionalism cultural ideas. In the beginning of the novel, familial or social obligations weretold through the stories of Mr. Temple, Charlotte, and La Rue. Thenarrator remarked that Mr. Temples brother was made completelywretched by marrying a disagreeable woman, wh... ...iserable and al oneness. The cardinal women began Charlotte Temple in the same fashion lookingfor independence and self-worth. However, then endings of the two womenwere different. It seemed as if the narrator is sayin g if one neverleaves or crimson returns to social obligations, the end result will behappiness. If one denies obligations, then the end result will bemisery. This novel, however radical it was regarding the risks ofsocial and familial obligations for personal attribution, basicallystated at the end that the one who does adheres to obligations will behappy in the end. So, in conclusion, Charlotte Temple did open frame downsocial norms by presenting the idea that people could have resistednormal social obligations to pursue personal happiness. However, itwas not so radical as to say that one would have been happy if theydenied their duties.