Running head : LOCAL GOVERNMENT CONSOLIDATION[AUTHOR][AUTHOR AFFILIATION]Thesis : Local presidential term consolidation fuel work on about domain of a functions of introductory government activity function like the energize department , flagellate collection and disposal , storm irrigate management , amusement and regional transportation facilities and servicesI . RationaleSince the introduction of the pattern of topical anesthetic government consolidation in the 1970s , any(prenominal) local governments from the states of Wisconsin and atomic number 74 Virginia dumb plant pee-peed citizens committees and tuition groups to check into the lessons of early implementation of the functions and services of some local government . Both partial and beat consolidation and mergers feature been considered and recomme ndations for the benefits and pitfalls of both approaches have also been depict . These studies were mainly found from several years of experiences from other states and locales that have had some successes in its implementation of the concept . The focus was on the processes of its implementation and the accessible system of bureaucracy that implemented the consolidation that make it surveil or a failII . Summary of lessons from each area1 .1 VirginiaWith Virginia , the review committee just submitted its findings last February 2005 [3] . The summary of its findings were as follows1 .1 .1 . Of the characteristics of favored consolidations and reorganizations , it was found that in that respect is streamlined democratic control1 .1 .2 . A integrated or integrate local government coordinate smoke be transformed into a General Purpose bureau , one that is flexible enough to function and serve whenever and wheresoever needed1 .1 .3 . The integrate structure also is enabled to have its own meet Independent F! inancial Resources . It generally means that the unified structure has the ability or is empowered to be able to conjure its own operational fundsOf the Positive or successful characteristics of consolidation , here are the summary of findings1 .2 .1 on that point is trim down duplication of governmental services and functions .
Thus , it saves tax capital and workforce resources that can be used elsewhere1 .2 .2 . There is increase recognise strength . Unified government structures have coordinated acceptation and fundraising capacity as well1 .2 .3 . There is an ability to lure national or state funding Precise ly because of the unified structure and large population base the coverage area warrants bigger federal and state funding allocation1 .2 .4 . Improved spoken language of services1 .2 .5 . There is also an improved image for a unified and coalesced government . Specifically because of the new and streamlined structure there is more facility to encourage and assists businesses and new industries to move and create a bigger market for its products , thus further influx of investorsMeanwhile the negative results of consolidation have been found to be as follows1 .3 .1 There is immediate loss of identity and self-direction for the littler government entities1 .3 .2 . There are fewer local jobs and pick out officials1 .3 .3 . There is a resultant high tax and fees for suburban and rural residents1 .3 .4 . There is higher initial...If you take to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment