Error Analysis

erroneousness Analysis In the experiment, the rate of acquired quickening realise to solemness is always less than the actual look on of acceleration due to gravity which is 9.8 m/s2. Possible sources of error of this nonice ar telephone line resistance, accuracy of the thingummy, and separate impels that could get hold of acted on the reject bullock block (Farris, Experimental Error). Because the air particles apply enduringness on the ball as they collide, the resulting force or gravitative force acting on the objects lessens (Coffey, What is Air enemy?). When the force is decreased, acceleration is then decreased. Also, tail force did act on the ball because of the shape and coat of the ball (Young & Freedman 179). The ball has a greater object to collide more with air particles for it has a great value of surface bea qualification its velocity lesser (Benson, Forces on a Falling objective (with air resistance)). On the another(prenominal) hand, the de vice could also extradite had some inaccuracies because the motion detector could thrust detected other particles present above it not only the ball such as dust particles.

This could have led to the wrong readings of the device thus affecting the deliberate acceleration. In addition, other forces that could have acted on the ball are attributed by the surroundings. The air from an galvanising fan could have changed the velocity of the ball thus resulting in deviation from the actual value of the acceleration due to gravity. Bibliography Benson, T., Forces on a Falling quarry (with air resistance); 2011. . Coffey, J., What is Air Resistance?; 2010. Farris,! T., Experimental Error; n.d. . Young, H. D. & Freedman, R. A., University physics with Modern Physics, 11th variate, 178-181; 2004.If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper